California Clean Slate Act AB 1076: Clear your arrest and conviction record today with California's new criminal record relief lawact now
(619) 232-5122

Law Office of Domenic J. Lombardo

Testimonials

Intelligent, protective, aggressive – a true winner.

jhoffman2, YP.com

Thank you, Domenic Lombardo.

Ahlia B., Yelp

I would proudly recommend Mr. Lombardo to anyone.

Ryan, Google

Supreme Court Continues to Protect the Fourth Amendment

Domenic Lombardo, San Diego Criminal Defense Lawyer

The United States Supreme Court pronounced yet another opinion safeguarding a person’s expectation of privacy, this time with respect to detentions occurring after a motor vehicle stop. The Court ruled that the police may not prolong traffic stops to allow a drug sniffing dog access to the vehicle. In California, the California Supreme Court has long held that the police may not prolong a traffic stop beyond what was reasonably necessary to effectuate the citation unless the officer is able to articulate a reasonable suspicion of continuing criminal behavior as the reason to continue the detention of the motorist. The short rule is that the officer needs to write the citation and then let the motorist go. The opinion follows a string of other cases ensuring Fourth Amendment vitality, for example, in a private property context, where the police are now prohibited from warrantless searches involving bringing a drug sniffing dog onto the porch of a home; the Court recently ruled against installing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle without a warrant; the Court has ruled against the police rummaging through a person’s cell phone without a warrant; and the Court has ruled against using a thermal imaging device to detect heat signals emanating from a person’s house that could indicate drug activity therein.

The current Supreme Court has resurrected Fourth Amendment protections  in a big way. The string of cases noted above are the most significant cases in the criminal defense landscape since the 1960s. What does this mean for criminal defendants facing charges relating to drug possession, transportation or distribution offenses? If the criminal defense lawyer can prove that law enforcement obtained evidence in violation of any of these cases, then the evidence discovered as a result of the illegal police activity will be suppressed and the case may be dismissed. The short cites for the cases: Rodriguez v. United States (drug sniffing dog after traffic stop), Kyllo v. United States (thermal imaging device), Florida v. Jardines (drug sniffing dog on front porch), and Riley v. California (rummaging through cell phone).

Domenic J. Lombardo

for a free and confidential consultation

call today (619) 232-5122

If you have a legal problem in California, contact an experienced California criminal defense attorney as soon as possible to ensure that your rights are protected. For a free and confidential consultation, call San Diego criminal defense attorney Domenic J. Lombardo at (619) 232-5122 or submit the secure form on this page.

Domenic Lombardo
Latest posts by Domenic Lombardo (see all)

Learn more:


  • Supreme Court Allows Warrantless Search of Apartment That Smelled of Marijuana
    Police officers who followed a suspect into his apartment complex were legally justified to knock down the door of an apartment that belonged to a different individual, when they detected a strong odor of marijuana emanating from the apartment and heard sounds of evidence being destroyed after announcing their presence,...
  • Supreme Court: BAC Reports Subject to the Sixth Amendment Scrutiny
    Recently, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution is prohibited from introducing a forensic laboratory report containing a BAC (blood alcohol concentration) certification through the in-court testimony of a scientist who did not sign the certification or perform or observe the test reported in the certification. The...
  • Supreme Court: Age of a Child is a Relevant Factor in Miranda Cases
    Recently, the United States Supreme Court has held that the age of a child subjected to police questioning is a relevant factor to consider in determining where a minor must be given Miranda warnings before being questioned by law enforcement officers. Under Miranda, an individual must be advised of the...
  • Supreme Court: California Must Reduce Its Prison Population
    Recently, the United States Supreme Court has upheld a cap imposed by a federal court on California’s prison population in order to reduce prison overcrowding and improve inmate health care. This extraordinary measure was a direct result of the state’s failure to control the growth of its own prison population....

About Domenic Lombardo

Domenic J. Lombardo, Attorney at Law and a member of California Attorneys for Criminal Justice (CACJ), graduated from University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), earning a B.A. in Economics-Business, before graduating with his J.D. from University of California, Hastings School of Law. Mr. Lombardo has been practicing as a criminal defense lawyer in San Diego for nearly 30 years, having started at the San Diego Office of the Public Defender in 1991 and then opened the Law Office of Domenic J. Lombardo in early 1996 as a sole practitioner. His practice is dedicated entirely to the defense of individuals accused of crimes and university misconduct, including Title IX allegations. While Mr. Lombardo works as the primary attorney for all his cases, he does have a team of investigators, forensic consultants, and paralegals to call on to help achieve the best possible result in every case. When he is not working, Mr. Lombardo is a family man, triathlete, and world traveler.

Law Office of San Diego Criminal Defense Attorney Domenic J. Lombardo

401 West A Street, Suite 1150
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 232-5122 https://www.attorneylombardo.com/wp-content/themes/attorney-lombardo/images/logo-alt.png $
Let's talk